Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2045

reference
81-tree-1
name
2045
tree-preservation-order

undefined

81-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.966718 50.854766)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.966662 50.854760,-0.966664 50.854771,-0.966672 50.854781,-0.966685 50.854789,-0.966700 50.854794,-0.966718 50.854796,-0.966735 50.854795,-0.966751 50.854790,-0.966764 50.854782,-0.966772 50.854772,-0.966775 50.854761,-0.966773 50.854750,-0.966765 50.854739,-0.966753 50.854731,-0.966737 50.854726,-0.966719 50.854724,-0.966702 50.854726,-0.966686 50.854731,-0.966673 50.854739,-0.966665 50.854749,-0.966662 50.854760)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL