Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1150

reference
808-tree-1
name
1150
tree-preservation-order

undefined

808-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005232 50.887913)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005190 50.887908,-1.005192 50.887917,-1.005198 50.887924,-1.005207 50.887930,-1.005219 50.887934,-1.005232 50.887936,-1.005245 50.887935,-1.005257 50.887931,-1.005267 50.887925,-1.005273 50.887917,-1.005275 50.887909,-1.005273 50.887901,-1.005267 50.887893,-1.005258 50.887887,-1.005246 50.887883,-1.005233 50.887882,-1.005220 50.887883,-1.005208 50.887887,-1.005198 50.887893,-1.005192 50.887900,-1.005190 50.887908)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL