Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1150

reference
809-tree-1
name
1150
tree-preservation-order

undefined

809-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.005086 50.887690)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.005016 50.887683,-1.005019 50.887697,-1.005029 50.887709,-1.005044 50.887719,-1.005064 50.887726,-1.005086 50.887728,-1.005108 50.887726,-1.005128 50.887720,-1.005144 50.887710,-1.005154 50.887698,-1.005158 50.887684,-1.005155 50.887670,-1.005145 50.887657,-1.005129 50.887647,-1.005110 50.887641,-1.005088 50.887638,-1.005066 50.887640,-1.005046 50.887646,-1.005030 50.887656,-1.005019 50.887669,-1.005016 50.887683)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL