Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1150

reference
810-tree-1
name
1150
tree-preservation-order

undefined

810-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004932 50.887456)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004861 50.887449,-1.004865 50.887463,-1.004874 50.887475,-1.004890 50.887485,-1.004910 50.887492,-1.004931 50.887494,-1.004953 50.887492,-1.004973 50.887486,-1.004989 50.887476,-1.005000 50.887464,-1.005003 50.887450,-1.005000 50.887436,-1.004990 50.887423,-1.004975 50.887413,-1.004955 50.887407,-1.004933 50.887404,-1.004911 50.887406,-1.004891 50.887413,-1.004875 50.887423,-1.004865 50.887435,-1.004861 50.887449)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL