Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2045

reference
82-tree-1
name
2045
tree-preservation-order

undefined

82-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.966239 50.854802)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.966182 50.854796,-0.966185 50.854807,-0.966192 50.854817,-0.966205 50.854825,-0.966220 50.854830,-0.966238 50.854832,-0.966256 50.854831,-0.966272 50.854826,-0.966284 50.854818,-0.966293 50.854808,-0.966296 50.854797,-0.966293 50.854786,-0.966285 50.854776,-0.966273 50.854767,-0.966257 50.854762,-0.966240 50.854760,-0.966222 50.854762,-0.966206 50.854767,-0.966193 50.854775,-0.966185 50.854785,-0.966182 50.854796)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL