Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1206

reference
814-tree-1
name
1206
tree-preservation-order

undefined

814-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008571 50.889397)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.008486 50.889387,-1.008490 50.889404,-1.008502 50.889419,-1.008520 50.889431,-1.008544 50.889439,-1.008570 50.889442,-1.008597 50.889440,-1.008620 50.889432,-1.008640 50.889420,-1.008652 50.889406,-1.008657 50.889389,-1.008653 50.889372,-1.008641 50.889357,-1.008622 50.889345,-1.008599 50.889337,-1.008572 50.889334,-1.008546 50.889337,-1.008522 50.889344,-1.008503 50.889356,-1.008491 50.889371,-1.008486 50.889387)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL