Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1206

reference
818-tree-1
name
1206
tree-preservation-order

undefined

818-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007810 50.889037)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007724 50.889028,-1.007728 50.889044,-1.007740 50.889059,-1.007759 50.889072,-1.007782 50.889079,-1.007809 50.889082,-1.007835 50.889080,-1.007859 50.889072,-1.007878 50.889061,-1.007891 50.889046,-1.007895 50.889029,-1.007891 50.889012,-1.007879 50.888997,-1.007861 50.888985,-1.007837 50.888977,-1.007811 50.888974,-1.007784 50.888977,-1.007761 50.888984,-1.007741 50.888996,-1.007729 50.889011,-1.007724 50.889028)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL