Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

2036

reference
83-tree-1
name
2036
tree-preservation-order

undefined

83-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.943668 50.860867)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.943612 50.860861,-0.943614 50.860872,-0.943622 50.860882,-0.943634 50.860890,-0.943650 50.860895,-0.943668 50.860897,-0.943685 50.860895,-0.943701 50.860890,-0.943714 50.860883,-0.943722 50.860873,-0.943725 50.860862,-0.943723 50.860850,-0.943715 50.860840,-0.943703 50.860832,-0.943687 50.860827,-0.943669 50.860825,-0.943652 50.860827,-0.943636 50.860832,-0.943623 50.860839,-0.943615 50.860849,-0.943612 50.860861)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL