Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1569

reference
824-tree-1
name
1569
tree-preservation-order

undefined

824-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.038426 50.877511)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.038327 50.877500,-1.038332 50.877520,-1.038345 50.877537,-1.038367 50.877551,-1.038395 50.877561,-1.038425 50.877564,-1.038456 50.877561,-1.038484 50.877552,-1.038506 50.877539,-1.038521 50.877521,-1.038526 50.877502,-1.038522 50.877482,-1.038508 50.877465,-1.038486 50.877450,-1.038459 50.877441,-1.038428 50.877438,-1.038397 50.877441,-1.038369 50.877449,-1.038347 50.877463,-1.038332 50.877481,-1.038327 50.877500)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL