Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0875

reference
829-tree-1
name
0875
tree-preservation-order

undefined

829-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.041690 50.872847)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.041591 50.872837,-1.041595 50.872856,-1.041609 50.872874,-1.041631 50.872888,-1.041658 50.872897,-1.041689 50.872901,-1.041720 50.872898,-1.041748 50.872889,-1.041770 50.872875,-1.041785 50.872858,-1.041790 50.872838,-1.041785 50.872819,-1.041772 50.872801,-1.041750 50.872787,-1.041722 50.872778,-1.041692 50.872775,-1.041661 50.872777,-1.041633 50.872786,-1.041611 50.872800,-1.041596 50.872817,-1.041591 50.872837)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL