Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0855

reference
846-tree-1
name
0855
tree-preservation-order

undefined

846-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.048437 50.858558)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.048380 50.858552,-1.048383 50.858563,-1.048391 50.858573,-1.048403 50.858581,-1.048419 50.858586,-1.048436 50.858588,-1.048454 50.858586,-1.048470 50.858581,-1.048483 50.858574,-1.048491 50.858564,-1.048494 50.858553,-1.048491 50.858541,-1.048484 50.858531,-1.048471 50.858523,-1.048455 50.858518,-1.048438 50.858516,-1.048420 50.858518,-1.048404 50.858523,-1.048392 50.858531,-1.048383 50.858541,-1.048380 50.858552)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL