Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0917

reference
849-tree-1
name
0917
tree-preservation-order

undefined

849-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.038011 50.859076)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.037898 50.859064,-1.037903 50.859086,-1.037919 50.859107,-1.037943 50.859123,-1.037975 50.859133,-1.038010 50.859137,-1.038045 50.859134,-1.038077 50.859124,-1.038103 50.859108,-1.038119 50.859088,-1.038125 50.859066,-1.038120 50.859044,-1.038104 50.859024,-1.038079 50.859008,-1.038048 50.858997,-1.038013 50.858993,-1.037978 50.858996,-1.037946 50.859006,-1.037920 50.859022,-1.037904 50.859042,-1.037898 50.859064)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL