Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0932

reference
850-tree-1
name
0932
tree-preservation-order

undefined

850-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.015251 50.851681)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.015180 50.851674,-1.015183 50.851688,-1.015193 50.851700,-1.015208 50.851710,-1.015228 50.851717,-1.015250 50.851719,-1.015272 50.851717,-1.015292 50.851711,-1.015308 50.851701,-1.015318 50.851689,-1.015322 50.851675,-1.015319 50.851661,-1.015309 50.851648,-1.015293 50.851638,-1.015274 50.851632,-1.015252 50.851629,-1.015230 50.851631,-1.015210 50.851638,-1.015194 50.851648,-1.015183 50.851660,-1.015180 50.851674)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL