Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1493

reference
86-tree-1
name
1493
tree-preservation-order

undefined

86-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.036242 50.866381)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.036143 50.866370,-1.036148 50.866390,-1.036161 50.866407,-1.036183 50.866422,-1.036211 50.866431,-1.036241 50.866434,-1.036272 50.866431,-1.036300 50.866422,-1.036322 50.866409,-1.036337 50.866391,-1.036342 50.866372,-1.036338 50.866352,-1.036324 50.866335,-1.036302 50.866321,-1.036275 50.866311,-1.036244 50.866308,-1.036213 50.866311,-1.036185 50.866320,-1.036163 50.866333,-1.036148 50.866351,-1.036143 50.866370)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL