Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1493

reference
87-tree-1
name
1493
tree-preservation-order

undefined

87-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.036239 50.866335)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.036140 50.866324,-1.036144 50.866344,-1.036158 50.866362,-1.036180 50.866376,-1.036207 50.866385,-1.036238 50.866388,-1.036269 50.866385,-1.036297 50.866377,-1.036319 50.866363,-1.036333 50.866345,-1.036339 50.866326,-1.036334 50.866307,-1.036320 50.866289,-1.036299 50.866275,-1.036271 50.866266,-1.036241 50.866262,-1.036210 50.866265,-1.036182 50.866274,-1.036160 50.866288,-1.036145 50.866305,-1.036140 50.866324)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL