Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
866-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

866-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.970998 50.866956)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.970956 50.866951,-0.970958 50.866960,-0.970963 50.866967,-0.970973 50.866973,-0.970984 50.866977,-0.970998 50.866979,-0.971011 50.866978,-0.971023 50.866974,-0.971032 50.866968,-0.971039 50.866960,-0.971041 50.866952,-0.971039 50.866944,-0.971033 50.866936,-0.971024 50.866930,-0.971012 50.866926,-0.970999 50.866925,-0.970986 50.866926,-0.970974 50.866930,-0.970964 50.866936,-0.970958 50.866943,-0.970956 50.866951)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL