Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
867-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

867-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971099 50.866717)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971014 50.866708,-0.971018 50.866725,-0.971030 50.866740,-0.971048 50.866752,-0.971072 50.866760,-0.971098 50.866762,-0.971125 50.866760,-0.971149 50.866753,-0.971168 50.866741,-0.971180 50.866726,-0.971185 50.866709,-0.971181 50.866693,-0.971169 50.866677,-0.971151 50.866665,-0.971127 50.866657,-0.971101 50.866655,-0.971074 50.866657,-0.971050 50.866664,-0.971031 50.866676,-0.971019 50.866691,-0.971014 50.866708)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL