Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1263

reference
876-tree-1
name
1263
tree-preservation-order

undefined

876-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.007765 50.887459)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.007694 50.887452,-1.007697 50.887466,-1.007707 50.887478,-1.007722 50.887488,-1.007742 50.887495,-1.007764 50.887497,-1.007786 50.887495,-1.007806 50.887489,-1.007822 50.887479,-1.007832 50.887467,-1.007836 50.887453,-1.007833 50.887439,-1.007823 50.887426,-1.007808 50.887416,-1.007788 50.887410,-1.007766 50.887407,-1.007744 50.887409,-1.007724 50.887416,-1.007708 50.887425,-1.007698 50.887438,-1.007694 50.887452)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL