Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1064

reference
880-tree-1
name
1064
tree-preservation-order

undefined

880-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.020257 50.879746)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.020200 50.879740,-1.020203 50.879751,-1.020211 50.879761,-1.020223 50.879769,-1.020239 50.879775,-1.020256 50.879777,-1.020274 50.879775,-1.020290 50.879770,-1.020303 50.879762,-1.020311 50.879752,-1.020314 50.879741,-1.020311 50.879730,-1.020303 50.879720,-1.020291 50.879712,-1.020275 50.879706,-1.020258 50.879705,-1.020240 50.879706,-1.020224 50.879711,-1.020211 50.879719,-1.020203 50.879729,-1.020200 50.879740)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL