Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
884-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

884-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018718 50.879364)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018661 50.879358,-1.018663 50.879369,-1.018671 50.879379,-1.018684 50.879387,-1.018700 50.879392,-1.018717 50.879394,-1.018735 50.879392,-1.018751 50.879387,-1.018763 50.879380,-1.018772 50.879370,-1.018775 50.879359,-1.018772 50.879347,-1.018764 50.879337,-1.018752 50.879329,-1.018736 50.879324,-1.018719 50.879322,-1.018701 50.879324,-1.018685 50.879329,-1.018672 50.879336,-1.018664 50.879346,-1.018661 50.879358)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL