Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
885-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

885-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018464 50.879303)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018407 50.879297,-1.018410 50.879308,-1.018417 50.879318,-1.018430 50.879326,-1.018446 50.879331,-1.018463 50.879333,-1.018481 50.879331,-1.018497 50.879326,-1.018509 50.879319,-1.018518 50.879309,-1.018521 50.879297,-1.018518 50.879286,-1.018510 50.879276,-1.018498 50.879268,-1.018482 50.879263,-1.018465 50.879261,-1.018447 50.879263,-1.018431 50.879268,-1.018418 50.879275,-1.018410 50.879285,-1.018407 50.879297)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL