Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1029

reference
90-tree-1
name
1029
tree-preservation-order

undefined

90-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.035085 50.862070)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.035000 50.862061,-1.035004 50.862078,-1.035016 50.862093,-1.035034 50.862105,-1.035058 50.862113,-1.035084 50.862116,-1.035111 50.862113,-1.035134 50.862106,-1.035154 50.862094,-1.035166 50.862079,-1.035170 50.862062,-1.035167 50.862046,-1.035155 50.862031,-1.035136 50.862018,-1.035113 50.862011,-1.035086 50.862008,-1.035060 50.862010,-1.035036 50.862018,-1.035017 50.862029,-1.035005 50.862044,-1.035000 50.862061)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL