Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1185

reference
892-tree-1
name
1185
tree-preservation-order

undefined

892-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.016570 50.879551)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.016513 50.879545,-1.016515 50.879556,-1.016523 50.879566,-1.016536 50.879574,-1.016551 50.879579,-1.016569 50.879581,-1.016586 50.879579,-1.016602 50.879574,-1.016615 50.879567,-1.016623 50.879557,-1.016626 50.879545,-1.016624 50.879534,-1.016616 50.879524,-1.016604 50.879516,-1.016588 50.879511,-1.016570 50.879509,-1.016553 50.879511,-1.016537 50.879516,-1.016524 50.879523,-1.016516 50.879533,-1.016513 50.879545)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL