Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
893-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

893-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971111 50.866096)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971068 50.866092,-0.971070 50.866100,-0.971076 50.866108,-0.971085 50.866114,-0.971097 50.866118,-0.971110 50.866119,-0.971124 50.866118,-0.971136 50.866114,-0.971145 50.866108,-0.971151 50.866101,-0.971154 50.866093,-0.971152 50.866084,-0.971146 50.866077,-0.971136 50.866071,-0.971125 50.866067,-0.971112 50.866065,-0.971098 50.866066,-0.971086 50.866070,-0.971077 50.866076,-0.971071 50.866084,-0.971068 50.866092)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL