Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
894-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

894-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.971065 50.866193)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.971009 50.866187,-0.971011 50.866198,-0.971019 50.866208,-0.971031 50.866216,-0.971047 50.866221,-0.971065 50.866223,-0.971082 50.866221,-0.971098 50.866217,-0.971111 50.866209,-0.971119 50.866199,-0.971122 50.866188,-0.971120 50.866176,-0.971112 50.866166,-0.971100 50.866158,-0.971084 50.866153,-0.971066 50.866151,-0.971049 50.866153,-0.971033 50.866158,-0.971020 50.866166,-0.971012 50.866176,-0.971009 50.866187)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL