Tree

There is a problem

1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference: 895-tree-1
name: 1499
tree-preservation-order: undefined
895-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point: POINT (-0.971041 50.866205)
geometry: MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.970984 50.866199,-0.970987 50.866210,-0.970995 50.866220,-0.971007 50.866228,-0.971023 50.866234,-0.971040 50.866235,-0.971058 50.866234,-0.971074 50.866229,-0.971087 50.866221,-0.971095 50.866211,-0.971098 50.866200,-0.971095 50.866189,-0.971088 50.866179,-0.971075 50.866171,-0.971059 50.866165,-0.971042 50.866164,-0.971024 50.866165,-0.971008 50.866170,-0.970996 50.866178,-0.970987 50.866188,-0.970984 50.866199)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date: 2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

Fix the errors indicated
Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL