Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1499

reference
897-tree-1
name
1499
tree-preservation-order

undefined

897-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.970518 50.865775)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.970404 50.865763,-0.970409 50.865785,-0.970425 50.865806,-0.970450 50.865822,-0.970481 50.865832,-0.970516 50.865836,-0.970551 50.865833,-0.970583 50.865823,-0.970609 50.865807,-0.970625 50.865787,-0.970631 50.865765,-0.970626 50.865743,-0.970611 50.865723,-0.970586 50.865707,-0.970554 50.865696,-0.970519 50.865692,-0.970484 50.865695,-0.970452 50.865705,-0.970427 50.865721,-0.970410 50.865741,-0.970404 50.865763)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL