Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0147

reference
9-tree-1
name
0147
tree-preservation-order

undefined

9-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.025498 50.873078)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.025427 50.873070,-1.025431 50.873084,-1.025440 50.873097,-1.025456 50.873107,-1.025476 50.873113,-1.025497 50.873116,-1.025519 50.873114,-1.025539 50.873108,-1.025555 50.873098,-1.025566 50.873085,-1.025569 50.873072,-1.025566 50.873058,-1.025556 50.873045,-1.025541 50.873035,-1.025521 50.873028,-1.025499 50.873026,-1.025477 50.873028,-1.025457 50.873034,-1.025441 50.873044,-1.025431 50.873056,-1.025427 50.873070)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL