Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0865

reference
905-tree-1
name
0865
tree-preservation-order

undefined

905-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.039427 50.860456)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.039370 50.860450,-1.039373 50.860461,-1.039381 50.860471,-1.039393 50.860479,-1.039409 50.860485,-1.039426 50.860486,-1.039444 50.860485,-1.039460 50.860480,-1.039473 50.860472,-1.039481 50.860462,-1.039484 50.860451,-1.039482 50.860440,-1.039474 50.860430,-1.039461 50.860422,-1.039445 50.860416,-1.039428 50.860414,-1.039410 50.860416,-1.039394 50.860421,-1.039382 50.860429,-1.039373 50.860439,-1.039370 50.860450)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL