Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1013

reference
906-tree-1
name
1013
tree-preservation-order

undefined

906-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.043431 50.866931)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.043317 50.866919,-1.043322 50.866942,-1.043338 50.866962,-1.043363 50.866978,-1.043394 50.866988,-1.043430 50.866992,-1.043465 50.866989,-1.043497 50.866979,-1.043522 50.866963,-1.043539 50.866943,-1.043545 50.866921,-1.043540 50.866899,-1.043524 50.866879,-1.043499 50.866863,-1.043468 50.866852,-1.043432 50.866848,-1.043397 50.866852,-1.043365 50.866862,-1.043340 50.866877,-1.043323 50.866897,-1.043317 50.866919)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL