Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1698

reference
92-tree-1
name
1698
tree-preservation-order

undefined

92-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.006839 50.866458)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.006768 50.866451,-1.006772 50.866465,-1.006781 50.866477,-1.006797 50.866488,-1.006817 50.866494,-1.006839 50.866496,-1.006861 50.866494,-1.006880 50.866488,-1.006896 50.866478,-1.006907 50.866466,-1.006911 50.866452,-1.006907 50.866438,-1.006898 50.866426,-1.006882 50.866416,-1.006862 50.866409,-1.006840 50.866407,-1.006818 50.866409,-1.006799 50.866415,-1.006783 50.866425,-1.006772 50.866437,-1.006768 50.866451)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL