Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1178

reference
913-tree-1
name
1178
tree-preservation-order

undefined

913-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.039384 50.860352)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.039356 50.860349,-1.039357 50.860355,-1.039361 50.860360,-1.039368 50.860364,-1.039384 50.860367,-1.039393 50.860367,-1.039401 50.860364,-1.039407 50.860360,-1.039413 50.860350,-1.039412 50.860344,-1.039408 50.860339,-1.039394 50.860332,-1.039385 50.860331,-1.039376 50.860332,-1.039368 50.860335,-1.039362 50.860339,-1.039356 50.860349)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL