Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1349

reference
931-tree-1
name
1349
tree-preservation-order

undefined

931-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.032893 50.876793)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.032836 50.876787,-1.032839 50.876798,-1.032847 50.876808,-1.032859 50.876816,-1.032875 50.876821,-1.032892 50.876823,-1.032910 50.876821,-1.032926 50.876816,-1.032939 50.876809,-1.032947 50.876799,-1.032950 50.876788,-1.032947 50.876776,-1.032939 50.876766,-1.032927 50.876758,-1.032911 50.876753,-1.032894 50.876751,-1.032876 50.876753,-1.032860 50.876758,-1.032847 50.876766,-1.032839 50.876775,-1.032836 50.876787)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL