Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1425

reference
939-tree-1
name
1425
tree-preservation-order

undefined

939-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028900 50.876853)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028872 50.876850,-1.028873 50.876856,-1.028877 50.876861,-1.028891 50.876868,-1.028900 50.876869,-1.028909 50.876868,-1.028917 50.876865,-1.028923 50.876861,-1.028929 50.876851,-1.028928 50.876845,-1.028924 50.876840,-1.028917 50.876836,-1.028901 50.876833,-1.028892 50.876833,-1.028884 50.876836,-1.028878 50.876840,-1.028872 50.876850)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL