Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1425

reference
940-tree-1
name
1425
tree-preservation-order

undefined

940-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.028882 50.876867)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.028854 50.876864,-1.028855 50.876870,-1.028859 50.876875,-1.028865 50.876879,-1.028882 50.876882,-1.028891 50.876882,-1.028899 50.876879,-1.028905 50.876875,-1.028911 50.876865,-1.028910 50.876859,-1.028906 50.876854,-1.028892 50.876847,-1.028883 50.876846,-1.028874 50.876847,-1.028866 50.876850,-1.028860 50.876854,-1.028854 50.876864)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL