Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0977

reference
944-tree-1
name
0977
tree-preservation-order

undefined

944-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026896 50.876966)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026783 50.876954,-1.026788 50.876976,-1.026803 50.876996,-1.026828 50.877012,-1.026860 50.877023,-1.026895 50.877027,-1.026930 50.877024,-1.026962 50.877014,-1.026987 50.876998,-1.027004 50.876978,-1.027010 50.876956,-1.027005 50.876934,-1.026989 50.876913,-1.026964 50.876897,-1.026933 50.876887,-1.026898 50.876883,-1.026863 50.876886,-1.026831 50.876896,-1.026805 50.876912,-1.026789 50.876932,-1.026783 50.876954)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL