Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1596

reference
948-tree-1
name
1596
tree-preservation-order

undefined

948-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009328 50.855933)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009172 50.855916,-1.009179 50.855947,-1.009201 50.855975,-1.009235 50.855997,-1.009278 50.856011,-1.009326 50.856016,-1.009375 50.856012,-1.009419 50.855998,-1.009454 50.855977,-1.009477 50.855949,-1.009485 50.855919,-1.009478 50.855888,-1.009456 50.855860,-1.009422 50.855838,-1.009379 50.855824,-1.009331 50.855819,-1.009282 50.855823,-1.009238 50.855837,-1.009203 50.855858,-1.009181 50.855886,-1.009172 50.855916)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL