Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1038

reference
950-tree-1
name
1038
tree-preservation-order

undefined

950-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023325 50.876339)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023240 50.876330,-1.023244 50.876347,-1.023256 50.876362,-1.023274 50.876374,-1.023298 50.876382,-1.023324 50.876385,-1.023351 50.876383,-1.023375 50.876375,-1.023394 50.876363,-1.023406 50.876348,-1.023411 50.876332,-1.023407 50.876315,-1.023395 50.876300,-1.023376 50.876288,-1.023353 50.876280,-1.023327 50.876277,-1.023300 50.876280,-1.023276 50.876287,-1.023257 50.876299,-1.023245 50.876314,-1.023240 50.876330)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL