Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1351

reference
955-tree-1
name
1351
tree-preservation-order

undefined

955-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.999915 50.854461)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.999815 50.854451,-0.999820 50.854470,-0.999834 50.854488,-0.999855 50.854502,-0.999883 50.854511,-0.999914 50.854514,-0.999944 50.854512,-0.999972 50.854503,-0.999995 50.854489,-1.000009 50.854472,-1.000014 50.854452,-1.000010 50.854433,-0.999996 50.854415,-0.999974 50.854401,-0.999947 50.854392,-0.999916 50.854388,-0.999885 50.854391,-0.999858 50.854400,-0.999835 50.854414,-0.999821 50.854431,-0.999815 50.854451)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL