Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1223

reference
960-tree-1
name
1223
tree-preservation-order

undefined

960-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.027080 50.869142)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.027037 50.869137,-1.027039 50.869146,-1.027045 50.869153,-1.027054 50.869159,-1.027066 50.869163,-1.027079 50.869165,-1.027104 50.869160,-1.027114 50.869154,-1.027120 50.869146,-1.027122 50.869138,-1.027120 50.869130,-1.027114 50.869122,-1.027105 50.869116,-1.027093 50.869112,-1.027080 50.869111,-1.027067 50.869112,-1.027055 50.869116,-1.027046 50.869122,-1.027039 50.869129,-1.027037 50.869137)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL