Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0932

reference
963-tree-1
name
0932
tree-preservation-order

undefined

963-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.014555 50.850962)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.014484 50.850955,-1.014487 50.850969,-1.014497 50.850981,-1.014512 50.850991,-1.014532 50.850998,-1.014554 50.851000,-1.014576 50.850998,-1.014596 50.850992,-1.014612 50.850982,-1.014622 50.850970,-1.014626 50.850956,-1.014623 50.850942,-1.014613 50.850930,-1.014597 50.850919,-1.014578 50.850913,-1.014556 50.850910,-1.014534 50.850913,-1.014514 50.850919,-1.014498 50.850929,-1.014488 50.850941,-1.014484 50.850955)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL