Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1463

reference
98-tree-1
name
1463
tree-preservation-order

undefined

98-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.002492 50.859798)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.002450 50.859794,-1.002452 50.859802,-1.002458 50.859810,-1.002467 50.859816,-1.002479 50.859820,-1.002492 50.859821,-1.002505 50.859820,-1.002517 50.859816,-1.002527 50.859810,-1.002533 50.859803,-1.002535 50.859794,-1.002533 50.859786,-1.002527 50.859778,-1.002518 50.859772,-1.002506 50.859768,-1.002493 50.859767,-1.002480 50.859768,-1.002468 50.859772,-1.002458 50.859778,-1.002452 50.859785,-1.002450 50.859794)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL