Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1377

reference
973-tree-1
name
1377
tree-preservation-order

undefined

973-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.008778 50.855907)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.008664 50.855895,-1.008669 50.855917,-1.008685 50.855937,-1.008710 50.855953,-1.008741 50.855964,-1.008776 50.855968,-1.008811 50.855964,-1.008843 50.855954,-1.008869 50.855939,-1.008885 50.855919,-1.008891 50.855897,-1.008886 50.855874,-1.008871 50.855854,-1.008846 50.855838,-1.008814 50.855828,-1.008779 50.855824,-1.008744 50.855827,-1.008712 50.855837,-1.008687 50.855853,-1.008670 50.855873,-1.008664 50.855895)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL