Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
975-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

975-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.010378 50.852900)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.010321 50.852894,-1.010324 50.852905,-1.010331 50.852915,-1.010344 50.852923,-1.010360 50.852928,-1.010377 50.852930,-1.010395 50.852928,-1.010411 50.852923,-1.010423 50.852916,-1.010432 50.852906,-1.010435 50.852894,-1.010432 50.852883,-1.010424 50.852873,-1.010412 50.852865,-1.010396 50.852860,-1.010379 50.852858,-1.010361 50.852860,-1.010345 50.852865,-1.010332 50.852872,-1.010324 50.852882,-1.010321 50.852894)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL