Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
976-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

976-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.010097 50.853258)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009984 50.853246,-1.009989 50.853269,-1.010005 50.853289,-1.010030 50.853305,-1.010061 50.853315,-1.010096 50.853319,-1.010131 50.853316,-1.010163 50.853306,-1.010189 50.853290,-1.010205 50.853270,-1.010211 50.853248,-1.010206 50.853226,-1.010190 50.853206,-1.010166 50.853190,-1.010134 50.853179,-1.010099 50.853175,-1.010064 50.853179,-1.010032 50.853189,-1.010007 50.853204,-1.009990 50.853224,-1.009984 50.853246)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL