Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
978-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

978-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009960 50.853183)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009847 50.853171,-1.009852 50.853193,-1.009868 50.853213,-1.009893 50.853230,-1.009924 50.853240,-1.009959 50.853244,-1.009994 50.853241,-1.010026 50.853231,-1.010052 50.853215,-1.010068 50.853195,-1.010074 50.853173,-1.010069 50.853151,-1.010053 50.853130,-1.010029 50.853114,-1.009997 50.853104,-1.009962 50.853100,-1.009927 50.853103,-1.009895 50.853113,-1.009870 50.853129,-1.009853 50.853149,-1.009847 50.853171)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL