Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1354

reference
983-tree-1
name
1354
tree-preservation-order

undefined

983-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.009812 50.852801)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.009784 50.852798,-1.009785 50.852803,-1.009789 50.852808,-1.009795 50.852812,-1.009803 50.852815,-1.009812 50.852816,-1.009829 50.852813,-1.009835 50.852809,-1.009839 50.852804,-1.009841 50.852798,-1.009835 50.852788,-1.009829 50.852784,-1.009813 50.852780,-1.009796 50.852783,-1.009785 50.852792,-1.009784 50.852798)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL