Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0888

reference
984-tree-1
name
0888
tree-preservation-order

undefined

984-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-0.968825 50.862928)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-0.968796 50.862925,-0.968801 50.862936,-0.968808 50.862940,-0.968824 50.862943,-0.968833 50.862943,-0.968841 50.862940,-0.968852 50.862931,-0.968853 50.862926,-0.968852 50.862920,-0.968848 50.862915,-0.968834 50.862908,-0.968825 50.862907,-0.968816 50.862908,-0.968808 50.862911,-0.968802 50.862915,-0.968796 50.862925)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL