Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1548

reference
992-tree-1
name
1548
tree-preservation-order

undefined

992-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017471 50.876198)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017386 50.876189,-1.017390 50.876206,-1.017401 50.876221,-1.017420 50.876233,-1.017444 50.876241,-1.017470 50.876244,-1.017496 50.876241,-1.017520 50.876234,-1.017539 50.876222,-1.017552 50.876207,-1.017556 50.876190,-1.017552 50.876174,-1.017541 50.876159,-1.017522 50.876147,-1.017498 50.876139,-1.017472 50.876136,-1.017446 50.876138,-1.017422 50.876146,-1.017403 50.876157,-1.017390 50.876172,-1.017386 50.876189)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL