Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1545

reference
993-tree-1
name
1545
tree-preservation-order

undefined

993-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.017832 50.876344)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.017776 50.876338,-1.017778 50.876349,-1.017786 50.876359,-1.017798 50.876367,-1.017814 50.876373,-1.017832 50.876374,-1.017849 50.876373,-1.017865 50.876368,-1.017878 50.876360,-1.017886 50.876350,-1.017889 50.876339,-1.017887 50.876328,-1.017879 50.876318,-1.017866 50.876310,-1.017851 50.876304,-1.017833 50.876303,-1.017816 50.876304,-1.017800 50.876309,-1.017787 50.876317,-1.017779 50.876327,-1.017776 50.876338)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL